Get philosophical critiques from
15 great thinkers

Paste a section of your philosophy essay and receive multi-perspective critiques from Plato to Rawls — grounded in real texts and argued in each philosopher's voice.

0 characters

How it works

📝
Step 1

Paste your essay

Submit a section of your philosophy paper — any topic from ethics to epistemology to political philosophy.

🔍
Step 2

We analyze & ground

Your essay is analyzed for keywords, claims, and relevant philosophical domains. We find grounding passages from each thinker's texts.

🎓
Step 3

Get multi-perspective feedback

Receive critiques from 15 philosophers, each engaging with your argument from their distinct theoretical framework and historical tradition.

Who's on your panel?

Critiques are generated by AI models acting in the voice of each philosopher, grounded in their actual texts and arguments.

P
Plato
Ancient Greek
Idealism / Ethics
A
Aristotle
Ancient Greek
Virtue Ethics
K
Kant
Modern
Deontology
H
Hume
Modern
Empiricism
M
Mill
Modern
Utilitarianism
N
Nietzsche
19th Century
Existentialism
R
Rawls
20th Century
Political Liberalism
N
Nozick
20th Century
Libertarianism
P
Peter Singer
Contemporary
Utilitarianism / Animal Ethics
P
Philippa Foot
Contemporary
Virtue Ethics
B
Bernard Williams
Contemporary
Moral Psychology
T
Thomas Nagel
Contemporary
Moral Luck / Ethics
D
Derek Parfit
Contemporary
Personal Identity / Metaethics
T
T.M. Scanlon
Contemporary
Contractualism
A
Alasdair MacIntyre
Contemporary
Virtue Ethics

Not sure what to write about?

Try an example prompt: argue that animal consciousness undermines utilitarianism, or that Rawls' veil of ignorance is too hypothetical to be useful.

Example essay:
"The use of animals for food is morally justified because humans are at the top of the food chain. Non-human animals lack the cognitive capacity for complex thought, so their interests do not count equally with human interests. A utilitarian calculus would show that the pleasure of human meat consumption outweighs any suffering of animals."